| Depth of Field | February 14, 2005 |
For our next photogroup assignment, I had the idea to practice using various depths of field because I didn't feel that I was very skilled in this area. To be honest, I usually set my camera to its macro setting whenever I want a limited DOF. Since I don't have an SLR, this seemed like the next best solution. Or at least, it was the easiest solution. But I know that changing the aperture is the "real" way to do it, so I wanted to try it out. I took my camera out (the S30, not the Pro1 because sadly that is still out for repairs) and walked around the block, taking several pictures of the same scene at various aperture settings. Undeterred by the fact that they all looked the same in my viewfinder, I kept shooting away. But when I got home and uploaded them all to my computer, I discovered that either there was no difference in depth of field, or I hadn't even gotten the focus right in the first place! Well, I learned two things. First, if you're shooting a scene in which all the objects are sufficiently far away from the camera, then you're not going to be able to play with DOF. This I verified by shooting photos of rooftops from down below on the street. Secondly, if you want a close object to be in focus and you're working with a camera that has a normal focus range of 80 cm, then you can't get 10 cm away from an object and expect it to be in focus, just because you change the aperture settings. (I know. I'm stupid. Bear with me... I'm trying to learn from my mistakes.) So DOF becomes kind of irrelevant when the foreground is out of focus anyway. So I went out again and took a few more photos. In the spirit of Valentine's day, here is my keychain wherein I profess my love for NY, first with a small aperture... Canon PowerShot S30 ![]()
Canon PowerShot S30 ![]() In this case, I prefer the first one (the one with a small aperture and a larger DOF) to the second. Which do you like better? In a similar vein, I carried out this same exercise with a different subject and posted the results on my black and white photoblog. In those photos, I have the opposite preference (the one with a wide aperture and a limited DOF). | |
| Categories: | |
| | Permalink | |
|
Comments
(Scroll back up to see photo.)
Ah! I started trying to figure out f-stops and depth of field a just a few weeks ago, myself. I realized that my lack of knowledge in that area was part of what was keeping me from acheiving some of the effects I was looking for (especially in portraits!). Some sites that I found useful in my search were http://www.uscoles.com/fstop.htm and http://www.azuswebworks.com/photography/dof.html . Often times I have to play around a lot to figure out where I want the focused part of my image to be. (Other times I have a hard time getting the camera to focus where I want it to. (I don't trust myself enough to manually set the focus.) I had a lot of problems in trying to get the bubble in focus when taking my photofriday "distorted" images. Anyway, looks like a good start. Can't wait to see more- I find mastering the techniques to obtain various depth of fields to be a very admirable goal! Posted by: Laura Semesky at February 15, 2005 12:10 AM
Once you know how to control depth of field you'll find a whole new world ready for exploration. If your camera has a zoom you can combine the longest zoom setting with the biggest aperture and achieve fine results. Have fun :-) Peter Posted by: Peter Stewart at February 15, 2005 09:55 AM
Tamara No. These compact digicams don't have great DOF control. By design these lenses are usually 8mm - 20mm or so and they are so wide that it is impossible to get good DOF [unless you are in a macro mode, the Minolta DImage 7hi I had had one]. The main reason I moved to a DSLR. Once you get a DSLR, it is a tonne of fun to play with DOF. The DOF is so shallow that I often end up with lots of partial OOF pictures. My latest favorite photo is this, was created just by DOF: http://clixclix.blogspot.com/2005/02/little-bit-of-predominant-red.html Posted by: Anand Sankaran at February 15, 2005 01:05 PM
I like the bottom one better. DOF is something I'm trying to work on myself so these tips are really good thanks for sharing and for posting up the photos :-) Posted by: leigh at February 15, 2005 06:56 PM
I like the simplicity of this shot. Thank you for putting me on your favourite list. Posted by: fotoaid at February 16, 2005 03:56 AM
i've also been working on this technique, and i would echo peter's suggestion. my camera has the same limitations as yours, so when i want to narrow my dof i use the zoom. it's not an ideal solution but it does work ok. and i prefer the bottom pic, too, just for the record:) Posted by: renee at February 16, 2005 09:12 AM
I like both, but I prefer the top one. I like its crispness, and I think the bottom one would have been better with less than f3 (yes I know it's hard...) But the two work for me :) Posted by: pierre at February 21, 2005 06:26 PM
|
|   |
|
Post a comment
|